Question 1

How does svls compare to Verible LSP for SystemVerilog?

Accepted Answer

svls is centered around svlint for customizable linting, making it strong for code quality enforcement, while Verible LSP might offer different parsing and analysis features. svls is better for teams prioritizing linting control, whereas Verible could have broader tool integration.

Question 2

How to configure svls for a multi-module SystemVerilog project?

Accepted Answer

Set the include_paths in .svls.toml to specify directories for module resolution, and define project-specific linting rules in .svlint.toml. Ensure all dependencies are correctly included and consider using plugins for custom checks as needed.

Question 3

Does svls support SystemVerilog 2017 features?

Accepted Answer

Support depends on svlint's implementation, as svls relies on it for parsing and linting. Check svlint's documentation or release notes for information on compliance with specific SystemVerilog standards like 2017.

Question 4

Can svls be integrated into a CI/CD pipeline for hardware design?

Accepted Answer

Yes, svls can be used in CI tools to run linting checks automatically, as it provides command-line access through the language server. Configure it to output results in a machine-readable format for seamless integration into pipelines.

Question 5

Is svls compatible with UVM verification methodology?

Accepted Answer

svls should handle UVM code since it's SystemVerilog-based, but UVM-specific linting may require custom plugins or configuration in .svlint.toml to properly handle macros and structures common in UVM.

svls

What is svls?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions