Question 1

How do I set up SharpBgfx on Linux or Mac?

Accepted Answer

You'll need to install Mono and rebuild the native bgfx library for your platform, as the README notes it's only tested on Windows. Then, drop the SharpBgfx.cs file into your project and ensure the native library is accessible in the runtime path.

Question 2

Is SharpBgfx better than using Unity or MonoGame for .NET graphics?

Accepted Answer

SharpBgfx is ideal for low-level, cross-platform rendering control similar to bgfx, while Unity and MonoGame offer higher-level game engine features. Choose SharpBgfx if you need direct bgfx integration without engine overhead.

Question 3

Can SharpBgfx work with .NET Core or .NET 5+?

Accepted Answer

Yes, it should work with modern .NET versions since it relies on P/Invoke, but you'll need to ensure the native bgfx library is compatible and properly linked. Testing might be required as it's primarily Windows-focused.

Question 4

What's the performance hit of using SharpBgfx vs native bgfx in C++?

Accepted Answer

Performance is close to native due to minimal P/Invoke overhead, but there might be slight penalties in marshaling data between managed and unmanaged code. For most graphics-intensive apps, it's efficient enough.

Question 5

How often does SharpBgfx update to match new bgfx releases?

Accepted Answer

Updates depend on the maintainer, and as a community project, it might lag behind bgfx releases. Check the GitHub repository for recent commits or forks to gauge activity and compatibility.

Question 6

Does SharpBgfx support advanced features like compute shaders or VR?

Accepted Answer

It exposes bgfx's capabilities, so features depend on the underlying bgfx version. You can access advanced rendering if bgfx supports it, but you'll need to handle the .NET bindings and shader integration manually.

SharpBgfx

What is SharpBgfx?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions