Question 1

Is rust-websocket still maintained?

Accepted Answer

The README notes maintainership is sluggish and advises using alternatives like tungstenite, indicating limited active development and potential abandonment.

Question 2

Rust-websocket vs tungstenite which should I use?

Accepted Answer

Rust-WebSocket offers more API flexibility with dual levels, but tungstenite is actively maintained, uses modern dependencies, and is recommended for new projects due to better ecosystem compatibility.

Question 3

How to create a WebSocket server with rust-websocket?

Accepted Answer

Run the provided example with 'cargo run --example server', but be prepared to adapt to outdated async patterns and potential setup complexities due to obsolete dependencies.

Question 4

Does rust-websocket work with async/await?

Accepted Answer

Since it relies on Tokio 0.1, it uses older async patterns and may not seamlessly integrate with modern async/await syntax without additional compatibility workarounds.

Question 5

What are the security implications of using rust-websocket?

Accepted Answer

While it supports WSS, the outdated dependencies (e.g., old crypto libraries) could introduce security risks, and sluggish maintainership means vulnerabilities might not be promptly patched.

Question 6

Can I use rust-websocket for legacy Rust projects?

Accepted Answer

Yes, it's suitable for systems already on Hyper 0.10 and Tokio 0.1, but upgrading or migrating to newer alternatives is advised for long-term viability.

rust-websocket

What is rust-websocket?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions