How do I install Open Build Service on Ubuntu?

OBS is optimized for openSUSE; while possible via advanced setup, native installation is smoother on openSUSE-based systems using the recommended appliance or packages, as per the README.

Open Build Service vs Jenkins for building Linux packages?

OBS is specialized for package building with multi-OS support and reproducibility, while Jenkins is a general CI/CD tool; OBS excels in distribution features but has a steeper learning curve.

Can OBS build Docker images?

OBS focuses on binary packages and distributions; for container images, you'd need to integrate with other tools, as it's not a core feature mentioned in the documentation.

How to automate builds with OBS API?

Use the XML API or command-line client (osc) to programmatically trigger and manage builds, integrating into CI/CD workflows for automation, as described in the key features.

What are the hardware requirements for running OBS in production?

OBS can be resource-intensive; for production, ensure sufficient CPU, memory, and storage, especially for distributed builds, though specifics depend on scale and are detailed in the administrator guide.

open-build-service

GPL-2.0Ruby1.7.1

A generic system to build and distribute binary packages from sources in an automatic, consistent, and reproducible way.

Visit Website GitHub

1.0k stars472 forks0 contributors

What is open-build-service?

Open Build Service is a generic system designed to build and distribute binary packages from source code automatically, consistently, and reproducibly. It solves the problem of managing complex build processes across multiple operating systems and hardware architectures, enabling the release of packages, updates, and entire distributions.

Target Audience

System administrators, DevOps engineers, and open-source project maintainers who need to automate and standardize package building and distribution across diverse platforms.

Value Proposition

Developers choose OBS for its robust automation, support for a wide range of OSes and architectures, and reproducible builds, which ensure reliability and consistency in software distribution without vendor lock-in.

Overview

Build and distribute Linux packages from sources in an automatic, consistent and reproducible way #obs

Use Cases

Best For

Automating Linux package builds for multiple distributions
Setting up reproducible build pipelines for open-source projects

Related Projects

Community-curated · Updated weekly · 100% open source

Found a gem we're missing?

Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.

Submit a project Star on GitHub

Distributing software updates and add-ons across different operating systems

Managing build infrastructure for cross-architecture software

Creating and maintaining custom Linux distributions or appliances

Integrating package building into CI/CD workflows

Not Ideal For

Small teams or projects that only need to build packages for a single Linux distribution
Organizations preferring cloud-native CI/CD services like GitHub Actions or GitLab CI for simplicity and integration
Projects requiring rapid setup without dedicated system administration resources
Environments where Windows or macOS are primary build targets without existing Linux infrastructure

Pros & Cons

Pros

Automated Package Building

Compiles packages from sources automatically, reducing manual intervention and ensuring consistent builds, as highlighted in the key features.

Cross-Platform Support

Builds for a wide range of operating systems and hardware architectures, enabling distribution across diverse environments, which is core to its value proposition.

Reproducible Builds

Ensures consistency and reliability in package generation, critical for security and maintenance, as emphasized in the project philosophy.

Comprehensive Distribution Channels

Supports releasing packages, updates, add-ons, appliances, and entire distributions through integrated tools, making it versatile for software delivery.

Cons

Complex Deployment

Installation requires using an appliance or running a setup wizard, making initial setup non-trivial and resource-intensive, as noted in the README.

Diverse Technology Stack

Backend in Perl and frontend in Ruby on Rails can complicate maintenance and require diverse developer skills, potentially increasing overhead.

Steep Learning Curve

Advanced features and distributed setups necessitate detailed knowledge, with the README pointing to an administrator guide for complex configurations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Home

Beginner-Friendly Projects

Open-source live-chat, email support, omni-channel desk. An alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬

Classy web-development dressed in a DSL (official / canonical repo)

Stars12,419

Forks2,065

Last commit5 days ago

chef

Chef Infra, a powerful automation platform that transforms infrastructure into code automating how infrastructure is configured, deployed and managed across any environment, at any scale

Stars8,197

Forks2,526

Last commit2 days ago

#software-distribution

#continuous-integration

Beginner-Friendly Projects84.2k