Is Material Design Lite still supported?

MDL is in limited support with no further development by the core team. Only critical bug fixes and PR reviews are handled, so for new projects, Material Components for the web is the recommended alternative.

Material Design Lite vs Material Components for the web?

MDL is the older, stable version for static sites using vanilla JS, while Material Components for the web is the actively developed successor with better framework integration and newer Material Design specs. MDL is deprecated in favor of MCW.

How to integrate MDL with a JavaScript framework like React?

You can use MDL with frameworks by including its vanilla JS and CSS, but it's not optimized for such setups. For better performance, consider using Material Components for the web, which has dedicated React bindings.

Does MDL work with modern browsers?

Yes, MDL provides A-grade support for modern browsers like Chrome, Firefox, and Safari, with graceful degradation for older versions like IE9, as detailed in the browser support table.

What are the alternatives to MDL for Material Design?

Alternatives include Material Components for the web (the official successor), Material-UI for React, and Vuetify for Vue.js, which offer more features and active development for modern web applications.

Open-Awesome

material-design-lite

Apache-2.0HTMLv1.3.0

A vanilla HTML/CSS/JS library for adding Material Design components to static websites.

Visit Website GitHub

32.2k stars4.9k forks0 contributors

What is material-design-lite?

Material Design Lite (MDL) is a lightweight front-end library that provides Material Design components using vanilla HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It allows developers to add Material Design aesthetics to static websites without depending on JavaScript frameworks, solving the need for a performant, accessible, and framework-agnostic UI solution.

Target Audience

Frontend developers and web designers building static websites or content-heavy projects who want to implement Material Design without the overhead of a full JavaScript framework.

Value Proposition

Developers choose MDL for its simplicity, framework independence, and focus on static site optimization, offering a straightforward way to apply Material Design with cross-browser compatibility and built-in accessibility.

Overview

Material Design Components in HTML/CSS/JS

Use Cases

Best For

Adding Material Design components to static HTML websites
Building lightweight web projects without JavaScript frameworks
Ensuring cross-browser compatibility for Material Design interfaces
Creating accessible web interfaces with Material Design aesthetics
Prototyping Material Design concepts quickly with vanilla tools
Integrating Material Design into legacy or simple web applications

Not Ideal For

Dynamic single-page applications (SPAs) requiring advanced JavaScript frameworks
Projects needing regular updates and new Material Design features
Teams building complex, interactive web applications with state management

Pros & Cons

Pros

Framework-Agnostic Simplicity

Built with vanilla HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, it allows integration into any static website without external dependencies, as emphasized in the README for lightweight projects.

Broad Browser Compatibility

Offers A-grade support for modern browsers and graceful CSS-only degradation for older ones like IE9, ensuring wide accessibility across devices.

Accessibility-First Design

Designed to be accessible from the start, following Material Design best practices for inclusive user experiences without extra configuration.

Lightweight Performance

Optimized for static content websites by avoiding heavy JavaScript frameworks, leading to faster load times and simpler implementations.

Cons

Limited Development Support

The project is in limited support mode with no active development by the core team, meaning bug fixes and new features are scarce, as stated in the README.

Deprecated in Favor of Successor

Development has moved to Material Components for the web, making MDL potentially obsolete and not recommended for new or evolving projects.

Static-Focused Limitations

While great for static sites, it lacks advanced features for dynamic, interactive applications, such as state management or real-time updates.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Projects

material-ui

Material UI: Comprehensive React component library that implements Google's Material Design. Free forever.

Stars98,627

Forks32,555

Last commit13 hours ago

material-design-icons

Material Design icons by Google (Material Symbols)

Stars53,648

Forks9,739

Last commit3 hours ago

materialize

Materialize, a CSS Framework based on Material Design

Stars38,840

Forks4,616

Last commit23 days ago

Angular

Component infrastructure and Material Design components for Angular

Stars25,040

Forks6,836

Last commit14 hours ago

Community-curated · Updated weekly · 100% open source

Found a gem we're missing?

Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.

Submit a project Star on GitHub