How to use Material Symbols in React?

Use the community-maintained npm package like material-symbols, or link the Google Fonts CDN and apply CSS classes; the README provides HTML examples that can be adapted with JSX for React components.

Material Symbols vs Font Awesome: which is better?

Material Symbols excel for Material Design consistency and variable font animations, while Font Awesome offers a larger, community-driven icon library with more brand logos and static icons; choose based on design system alignment.

Can I animate icon fills with Material Symbols?

Yes, the Fill axis in Material Symbols allows animation from 0 to 100, enabling smooth transitions to indicate selection, as described in the README for dynamic effects.

How to request a new icon for Material Design Icons?

Submit an issue on GitHub with concept descriptions or external examples, but Google does not accept finished SVG designs due to strict guidelines, as noted in the README.

What's the difference between Material Symbols and Material Icons?

Material Symbols are the current set with variable font technology for dynamic styling, while Material Icons is the classic, no-longer-updated set with static icons and two-tone variants, per the README.

Are Material Design Icons free for commercial use?

Yes, they are licensed under Apache 2.0, allowing free use in commercial products with optional attribution, as stated in the license section of the README.

Open-Awesome

material-design-icons

Apache-2.04.0.0

Official Material Design icon sets from Google, including variable font-based Material Symbols and classic Material Icons.

Visit Website GitHub

53.2k stars9.7k forks0 contributors

What is material-design-icons?

Material Design Icons is a collection of official icon sets from Google, comprising Material Symbols (the modern variable font-based set) and Material Icons (the classic set). It provides scalable, customizable icons that adhere to Material Design guidelines, solving the need for consistent, high-quality visual assets in web and app interfaces.

Target Audience

Frontend developers, UI/UX designers, and product teams building applications with Material Design or seeking polished, accessible iconography.

Value Proposition

Developers choose this for its official Google backing, design consistency, variable font capabilities for dynamic styling, and easy integration via Google Fonts CDN or npm packages, ensuring reliable and up-to-date iconography.

Overview

Material Design icons by Google (Material Symbols)

Use Cases

Best For

Implementing Material Design in web or mobile apps
Adding customizable icons with variable font properties like weight and fill
Ensuring design consistency across a product's UI
Quickly embedding icons via Google Fonts CDN
Using outlined, rounded, or sharp icon styles
Projects requiring scalable vector icons with multiple variants

Not Ideal For

Projects requiring custom or brand-specific icons not in the Material Design set, as Google does not accept pull requests for new designs and excludes third-party logos
Applications that depend on two-tone icons in the modern variable font set, since Material Symbols lack this style (only available in the legacy Material Icons)
Teams preferring npm packages directly maintained by Google, as the current packages are community-hosted and not officially vetted
Designs needing pixel-perfect alignment at all sizes, because Material Symbols only ensure perfect grid alignment at 20 and 24 px

Pros & Cons

Pros

Variable Font Flexibility

Material Symbols offer design axes for optical size, weight, grade, and fill, enabling dynamic styling and animations via CSS, as highlighted in the README for advanced customization.

Official Design Consistency

Icons adhere to Material Design guidelines, providing reliable, visually harmonious assets backed by Google, ensuring consistency across interfaces.

Easy Web Integration

Icons can be embedded via Google Fonts CDN with simple HTML link tags, making setup quick and accessible for web projects without complex tooling.

Multiple Style Variants

Available in outlined, rounded, sharp, and filled variants (or two-tone for Material Icons), allowing designers to match diverse aesthetic needs, as detailed in the README.

Cons

Limited Customization Support

Google does not accept pull requests for new icons—requests must be submitted as issues, and third-party logos are excluded, hindering extensibility for unique needs.

Community-Maintained npm Packages

The npm packages are hosted by a third party, not Google, which may raise concerns about long-term support and security, as admitted in the README.

Pixel Alignment Limitations

Material Symbols only have perfect pixel-grid alignment at 20 and 24 px sizes, potentially causing blurriness or inconsistency in high-precision designs at other scales.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Projects

material-ui

Material UI: Comprehensive React component library that implements Google's Material Design. Free forever.

Materialize, a CSS Framework based on Material Design

Stars38,925

Forks4,651

Last commit11 days ago

material-design-lite

Material Design Components in HTML/CSS/JS

Stars32,176

Forks4,933

Last commit1 year ago

Angular

Component infrastructure and Material Design components for Angular

Stars25,011

Forks6,843