Question 1

How do I convert existing HTML to Fun.Blazor computation expressions?

Accepted Answer

Use Fun.Dev.Tools to automatically convert HTML into F# computation expression syntax, as mentioned in the features, which helps migrate legacy code or speed up development with pre-existing templates.

Question 2

Fun.Blazor vs Bolero for F# web apps?

Accepted Answer

Both are F# libraries for Blazor, but Fun.Blazor focuses on a computation expression DSL and adaptive models, while Bolero uses a different approach; benchmarks show Fun.Blazor can be faster in some cases, but choice depends on preferred state management and syntax.

Question 3

Can I use standard Blazor components with Fun.Blazor?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but third-party C# Blazor components may require wrapping in F# DSL or adapters, which can add integration overhead compared to native C# usage.

Question 4

What's the difference between adaptive and Elmish in Fun.Blazor?

Accepted Answer

Adaptive models use real-time data flow for efficient updates, recommended for performance, while Elmish follows a unidirectional architecture; the library supports both, allowing developers to choose based on app complexity.

Question 5

How does dependency injection work in Fun.Blazor?

Accepted Answer

It integrates seamlessly with Blazor's DI via `html.inject`, letting you inject services directly into components in a type-safe manner, similar to C# but with F# syntax.

Question 6

Is Fun.Blazor good for server-side rendering (SSR)?

Accepted Answer

The README benchmarks include SSR templates, showing it works with Blazor Server, but performance trade-offs and F# tooling might affect scalability compared to C# alternatives.

Fun.Blazor

What is Fun.Blazor?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions