Question 1

Bolero vs standard Blazor with C#: which is better for F# developers?

Accepted Answer

Bolero is tailored for F# developers, offering functional patterns like Elmish and type-safe features, whereas standard Blazor with C# is more imperative and has a larger ecosystem. For F# teams, Bolero provides better integration and productivity, but C# Blazor might be preferable for accessing more third-party components.

Question 2

How to handle state management in a Bolero app?

Accepted Answer

State management is handled via the Elmish architecture, where you define a model, update functions, and views. Bolero integrates this directly into Blazor components, ensuring predictable state changes with immutable data patterns, similar to Redux in JavaScript frameworks.

Question 3

Can Bolero apps be deployed to static hosting services?

Accepted Answer

Yes, Bolero apps are Blazor WebAssembly applications, so they can be deployed as static files to services like Azure Static Web Apps or Netlify. However, server-side remoting features require a backend server, limiting full static deployment for apps needing server logic.

Question 4

What are the performance implications of using Bolero's optimizations?

Accepted Answer

Bolero's optimization strips F# signature data to reduce bundle sizes, which improves initial load times for WebAssembly apps. Performance is comparable to other Blazor apps, but the Elmish overhead might add minor runtime costs for complex state updates, so benchmarking is advised for high-traffic apps.

Question 5

How to add authentication to a Bolero application?

Accepted Answer

Authentication can be implemented using standard ASP.NET Core techniques on the server, with Bolero's remoting for secure client-server communication. There's no built-in auth, but it integrates with .NET's identity systems, requiring manual setup for roles and permissions.

Question 6

Is hot reload reliable in Bolero with templating?

Accepted Answer

Hot reload is supported via type providers in templating, allowing real-time UI updates during development. However, it may depend on IDE configurations and can be less consistent than hot reload in some JavaScript frameworks, occasionally requiring manual refreshes.

Question 7

How does Bolero compare to Fable for F# web development?

Accepted Answer

Bolero uses Blazor and WebAssembly for a full .NET stack, while Fable compiles F# to JavaScript for use with React or other JS frameworks. Bolero is better for teams invested in the .NET ecosystem and wanting type safety with Blazor, whereas Fable offers more flexibility with JavaScript libraries and a larger front-end community.

Bolero

What is Bolero?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions