A comprehensive collection of templates, examples, and guidance for creating and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs).
Architecture Decision Record (ADR) is a repository offering templates, examples, and tutorials for documenting software architecture decisions. It helps teams capture the context, rationale, and consequences of significant technical choices to improve transparency and knowledge sharing across projects. The collection supports various documentation styles and integrates with common development tools.
Software architects, technical leads, engineering managers, and development teams who need to document and communicate architectural decisions effectively. It's also valuable for organizations establishing or refining their architecture governance processes.
It consolidates widely-used ADR templates and real-world examples in one place, saving teams time and providing proven patterns. The practical guidance on teamwork and tool integration helps teams adopt ADRs smoothly, promoting better decision-making and long-term project maintainability.
Architecture decision record (ADR) examples for software planning, IT leadership, and template documentation
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Includes multiple popular ADR templates from sources like Michael Nygard, MADR, and Jeff Tyree & Art Akerman, providing flexibility for different documentation styles and team preferences.
Offers concrete examples on topics like CSS frameworks, monorepos, and secrets storage, helping teams understand how to apply ADRs in actual project contexts.
Provides detailed advice on roles, lifecycle management, and governance questions, addressing common challenges in integrating ADRs into team workflows.
Suggests ways to use ADRs with git, project management tools like Jira, and wikis, making adoption easier by fitting into existing development ecosystems.
Introduces advanced topics like fitness functions for decision validation and the C4 model for diagramming, connecting ADRs to broader software architecture practices.
It's a documentation collection without tools for automated decision checks or enforcement; teams must implement their own systems using external tools like Decision Guardian.
With over a dozen templates, new teams may face decision paralysis without clear guidance on which template best suits specific project sizes or compliance needs.
The README advises mutability over immutability for 'living documents,' which can lead to inconsistent practices and dilute the ADR's purpose as a reliable decision log.