Question 1

How does texreg compare to stargazer for regression tables?

Accepted Answer

texreg offers more customization options and supports multiple output formats, while stargazer is often simpler for basic needs. texreg is preferred for complex, publication-ready tables, but stargazer might have a shorter learning curve for straightforward tasks.

Question 2

How to change the significance levels in texreg output?

Accepted Answer

Use the 'stars' argument in the texreg function to set custom p-value thresholds for significance stars. Detailed examples are provided in the package vignette or referenced StackOverflow posts for advanced adjustments.

Question 3

Can texreg handle output from Bayesian models like those in rstanarm?

Accepted Answer

texreg has some built-in support for common models, but for specific Bayesian models, you may need to write custom extensions using the 'extract' function. Check the documentation or community examples on StackOverflow for guidance.

Question 4

What's the best way to export texreg tables to Microsoft Word with custom styles?

Accepted Answer

texreg can output directly to Word format, but for precise custom styles, you might need to edit the generated document or use the HTML output with additional conversion tools. The flexibility exists but may require post-processing.

Question 5

How to include goodness-of-fit statistics from different model types in one texreg table?

Accepted Answer

texreg automatically extracts common fit statistics; for non-standard models, create custom texreg objects using the 'extract' function and combine them in a table. This allows consolidation even with varying model specifications.

texreg

What is texreg?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions