Question 1

How do I use the Maybe monad from Sweet-monads in a TypeScript project?

Accepted Answer

Import the Maybe module and use its methods like 'of', 'fromNullable', and 'map' to handle optional values safely. For example, wrap a nullable value with Maybe.fromNullable(value) to avoid runtime errors, and chain operations with type safety. Check the GitHub repository's maybe directory for specific code examples.

Question 2

Sweet-monads vs fp-ts: which should I choose for functional programming in TypeScript?

Accepted Answer

Sweet-monads is better for lightweight, dependency-free use with basic monads, while fp-ts offers a more extensive ecosystem with advanced features like monad transformers and a larger community. Choose Sweet-monads if you need minimal auditability and simple monads; opt for fp-ts for complex functional programming needs and broader tooling.

Question 3

Does Sweet-monads support asynchronous operations or Promises?

Accepted Answer

No, Sweet-monads does not include async monads or built-in support for Promises out of the box. You would need to handle async code separately or combine it with other libraries, as it focuses on synchronous monadic patterns and lazy iterators.

Question 4

Can I integrate Sweet-monads with React for state management?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but it requires manual integration since Sweet-monads doesn't provide React-specific hooks or components. You can use monads like Maybe or Either within React components to manage state and errors, but you'll need to write custom code to tie them into React's lifecycle and rendering.

Question 5

What are the performance benefits of using lazy iterators in Sweet-monads?

Accepted Answer

Lazy iterators process data on-demand, reducing memory usage by not pre-loading entire sequences, which is ideal for large or infinite datasets. This can improve performance in scenarios like streaming or batch processing, as operations are deferred until iteration occurs.

Question 6

Is Sweet-monads production-ready for enterprise applications?

Accepted Answer

Yes, due to its minimalistic, auditable code and MIT license, it's suitable for production. However, consider the limited feature set and ensure your team is comfortable with functional programming patterns, as you might need to supplement it with other libraries for complex needs.

sweet-monads

What is sweet-monads?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions