A .NET assertion framework that provides clear, human-readable error messages for unit tests.
Shouldly is a .NET assertion framework designed to improve unit testing by providing clear, human-readable error messages when tests fail. It replaces traditional assertion methods with a fluent, expressive syntax that makes test code more intuitive and failure diagnostics faster. The framework automatically includes the tested expression in error output, eliminating ambiguity about what went wrong.
.NET developers writing unit tests with frameworks like xUnit, NUnit, or MSTest who want more maintainable test code and better failure messages. It's particularly valuable for teams prioritizing test readability and reduced debugging time.
Developers choose Shouldly over built-in assertions because it dramatically improves test failure messages, making debugging faster and tests more expressive. Its fluent API and automatic context inclusion provide a superior developer experience compared to traditional assertion libraries.
Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Uses extension methods like .ShouldBe() for readable code, as shown in the README comparison to traditional Assert.That syntax, making tests more expressive.
Includes the tested expression in failure messages, e.g., 'contestant.Points should be 1337 but was 0', which reduces debugging time by providing immediate context.
Offers ShouldMatchApproved for snapshot testing, with optional diff visualization via the Shouldly.DiffEngine package, enhancing test validation for UI or output comparisons.
Provides a wide range of assertions for collections, strings, exceptions, and more, covering common testing scenarios without needing separate libraries.
Approval testing requires installing and configuring the separate Shouldly.DiffEngine package for diff visualization, adding complexity and an additional dependency.
Generating detailed error messages may introduce overhead in test execution, which could slow down large test suites compared to simpler assertion libraries.
The README doesn't highlight native support for asynchronous testing patterns, which might require workarounds or additional code for modern .NET applications.