Question 1

How to handle nested unknown fields in Marshmallow?

Accepted Answer

You must implement the JSONDataErrorHandler interface on your structs, as mentioned in the README. This allows capturing dynamic data within nested structures, but it requires extra code compared to top-level fields.

Question 2

Marshmallow vs json.Unmarshal: which is better for known schemas?

Accepted Answer

For fully known schemas, json.Unmarshal is slightly more memory-efficient (304 B/op vs. 608 B/op) and simpler, as Marshmallow's mixed-data features add overhead. Use Marshmallow only when you need to preserve unknown fields.

Question 3

How to skip populating struct in Marshmallow for performance?

Accepted Answer

Use the WithSkipPopulateStruct option when calling Unmarshal. This boosts speed by omitting struct population, useful when you only need the dynamic map, as shown in benchmarks where it reduces time to 1751 ns/op.

Question 4

Does Marshmallow support JSON schema validation?

Accepted Answer

No, Marshmallow focuses on unmarshalling with data retention, not validation. You would need to pair it with a separate validation library if schema enforcement is required for your JSON data.

Question 5

Can I use Marshmallow with web frameworks like Gin or Echo?

Accepted Answer

Yes, Marshmallow works seamlessly with any Go web framework. You can use it in request handlers to unmarshal JSON payloads with mixed data, similar to how you'd use json.Unmarshal, but with added flexibility for unknown fields.

Question 6

Is Marshmallow production-ready for high-performance applications?

Accepted Answer

Yes, with benchmarks showing up to 3x faster performance than alternatives for mixed data and 92.6% test coverage, it's suitable for production. However, monitor for updates due to its external dependency nature.

marshmallow

What is marshmallow?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions