Open-Awesome
CategoriesAlternativesStacksSelf-HostedExplore
Open-Awesome

© 2026 Open-Awesome. Curated for the developer elite.

TermsPrivacyAboutGitHubRSS
  1. Home
  2. Engineering Team Management
  3. Paper we love: Software Engineering Organizations

Paper we love: Software Engineering Organizations

Shell

A community-curated directory of notable computer science papers with local chapters for discussion and learning.

Visit WebsiteGitHubGitHub
108.1k stars6.4k forks0 contributors

What is Paper we love: Software Engineering Organizations?

Papers We Love is a community-driven project that curates and organizes notable academic computer science papers into a searchable directory. It solves the problem of scattered research resources by providing a centralized collection and fosters learning through local chapter meetups and online discussions.

Target Audience

Computer science students, researchers, engineers, and enthusiasts who want to explore academic papers, stay updated with research trends, and participate in community discussions about technical literature.

Value Proposition

Developers choose Papers We Love for its carefully curated paper selection, active global community with local meetups, and extensive supplementary resources including reading guides and alternative paper repositories.

Overview

Papers from the computer science community to read and discuss.

Use Cases

Best For

  • Finding foundational computer science papers recommended by peers
  • Joining local meetups to discuss academic research with enthusiasts
  • Discovering alternative repositories and blogs for paper recommendations
  • Learning how to effectively read and understand scientific papers
  • Exploring curated lists of award-winning or influential research
  • Connecting with a global Discord community interested in CS literature

Not Ideal For

  • Researchers needing direct, hosted access to full-text PDFs for all papers, as many are only linked externally due to licenses.
  • Projects requiring advanced search or metadata filtering beyond a simple markdown directory structure.
  • Individuals seeking pre-written summaries or deep analysis, rather than community-led discussions.

Pros & Cons

Pros

Curated Paper Directory

The repository aggregates community-vetted computer science papers with quality indicators like scroll emojis for hosted content, as highlighted in the README's directory description.

Active Global Community

Features local chapter meetups with a Code of Conduct and a Discord server for real-time discussions, fostering knowledge sharing beyond just paper links.

Resource Aggregation

Includes an extensive wiki and README with links to other paper repositories, blogs, and reading guides, helping users find additional material easily.

Download Automation Tool

Provides a command-line script (./scripts/download.sh) to scrape and download PDFs linked in the directory, simplifying access to papers with configurable options.

Cons

Limited Direct Hosting

Due to licensing restrictions, many papers are not hosted directly, requiring users to follow external links that can be broken or inaccessible over time.

Manual Curation Overhead

Relies on community pull requests for updates, which may lead to gaps in coverage, outdated links, or slower addition of new papers compared to automated systems.

Lacks Built-in Search

As a markdown-based repository, it doesn't offer advanced search or filtering features, making it harder to navigate than dedicated paper databases with metadata support.

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick Stats

Stars108,075
Forks6,394
Contributors0
Open Issues2
Last commit23 days ago
CreatedSince 2013

Tags

#education#computer-science#papers#knowledge-sharing#meetup#meetups#open-knowledge#academic-papers#community-learning#programming#awesome

Links & Resources

Website

Included in

Engineering Team Management2.4k
Auto-fetched 4 hours ago

Related Projects

What Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect TeamWhat Google Learned From Its Quest to Build the Perfect Team

“Google's data indicated that psychological safety, more than anything else, was critical to making a team work. (…) The behaviors that create psychological safety — conversational turn-taking and empathy — are part of the same unwritten rules we often turn to, as individuals, when we need to establish a bond.”

Stars0
Forks0
Last commit
Building and Motivating Engineering TeamsBuilding and Motivating Engineering Teams

What DO engineers want? Money, purpose and respect

Stars0
Forks0
Last commit
Developer Tropes: "Google does it"Developer Tropes: "Google does it"

It's cargo-cultish to imitate the big names in our industry as a path to success. Instead, the take home from this article “would be that managers and other leaders should be like ecologists; who measure, observe and nurture their ecosystems. Doing so will help build a unique workplace that will yield great results.”

Stars0
Forks0
Last commit
Community-curated · Updated weekly · 100% open source

Found a gem we're missing?

Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.

Submit a projectStar on GitHub