Question 1

Is MySqlConnector faster than MySql.Data?

Accepted Answer

Yes, benchmarks show MySqlConnector consistently outperforms MySql.Data in data retrieval and memory usage, making it ideal for high-performance .NET applications. It's optimized for modern .NET runtimes and async operations.

Question 2

How to migrate from MySql.Data to MySqlConnector?

Accepted Answer

Replace the NuGet package reference, update connection strings and namespace imports. Test thoroughly for API differences, as MySqlConnector doesn't replicate all MySql.Data methods, which may require code changes.

Question 3

Does MySqlConnector work with Entity Framework Core?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but indirectly through Pomelo.EntityFrameworkCore.MySql. MySqlConnector is the ADO.NET driver, so you need Pomelo as the EF Core provider, adding an extra layer compared to MySql.Data's direct support.

Question 4

MySqlConnector vs Pomelo: which one should I use?

Accepted Answer

MySqlConnector is the underlying ADO.NET driver for raw database access or with ORMs like Dapper. Pomelo is the Entity Framework Core provider built on MySqlConnector. Use MySqlConnector for ADO.NET, Pomelo for EF Core.

Question 5

Is MySqlConnector stable for production use?

Accepted Answer

Yes, it's used by companies like Devolutions and Faithlife in production, with regular updates. However, as an open-source project, ensure testing for your specific scenarios, as it lacks Oracle's official support guarantees.

Question 6

How to handle async database calls with MySqlConnector?

Accepted Answer

Use the async methods like ExecuteReaderAsync or DbBatch for batch operations. MySqlConnector implements true async I/O, avoiding thread pool blocking, which is key for scalable .NET Core apps.

MySqlConnector

What is MySqlConnector?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Open Source Alternative To

Frequently Asked Questions