Question 1

MQTT-Client-Framework vs CocoaMQTT for iOS

Accepted Answer

MQTT-Client-Framework is Objective-C-based with CoreData persistence, ideal for reliability, while CocoaMQTT is Swift-native and lighter. Choose based on language preference and persistence needs; MQTT-Client-Framework excels in robust, native Apple integration.

Question 2

How to use MQTT-Client-Framework with AWS IoT in Swift

Accepted Answer

Import the framework, use MQTTWebsocketTransport with the AWS IoT endpoint URL as shown in the README, and handle sessions with Objective-C bridging in Swift. Ensure TLS is configured for secure connections.

Question 3

Does MQTT-Client-Framework support offline messaging

Accepted Answer

Yes, it uses CoreData for persistence, storing messages locally when offline and syncing upon reconnection. Implement delegate methods like newMessage: to manage message flow reliably.

Question 4

What brokers work best with MQTT-Client-Framework

Accepted Answer

It's tested with many brokers including Mosquitto, RabbitMQ, HiveMQ, and AWS IoT, as listed in the README. For best results, use standard MQTT 3.1.1-compliant brokers to avoid compatibility issues.

Question 5

How to install MQTT-Client-Framework without CocoaPods

Accepted Answer

Use Carthage by adding the GitHub repo to your Cartfile, or manually via git submodule or framework drag-and-drop, as detailed in the README. Carthage is recommended for simpler dependency management.

Question 6

Is MQTT-Client-Framework good for real-time chat apps

Accepted Answer

Yes, it's designed for real-time communication with MQTT, and an example app MQTTChat is provided. It supports QoS levels for reliable messaging, making it suitable for chat applications on Apple platforms.

MQTT-Client-Framework

What is MQTT-Client-Framework?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions