Question 1

How does Lura compare to KrakenD?

Accepted Answer

Lura is the underlying Go framework for building custom API gateways, while KrakenD is a complete, ready-to-run API Gateway built on Lura. Use Lura for development flexibility; choose KrakenD for a pre-packaged solution with more features out of the box.

Question 2

Can Lura handle WebSocket connections?

Accepted Answer

Lura primarily focuses on HTTP(S) and can be adapted for other protocols, but WebSocket support isn't built-in. You would need to implement custom middleware or extensions to handle WebSocket connections.

Question 3

How to add authentication like OAuth to Lura?

Accepted Answer

Authentication can be added via middleware plugins. Lura supports extensible middlewares, so you integrate OAuth plugins by configuring them in your JSON setup or through custom code, as referenced in the middleware support section.

Question 4

Is Lura suitable for GraphQL APIs?

Accepted Answer

Lura is designed for RESTful aggregation and optimization, not natively for GraphQL. While you could adapt it with custom middleware, GraphQL-specific gateways like Apollo might be more appropriate for such use cases.

Question 5

What are the performance benchmarks for Lura?

Accepted Answer

Lura emphasizes high performance, with benchmark results detailed in the documentation. It shows low latency and high throughput in aggregation scenarios, making it competitive for microservices architectures.

Question 6

How to deploy Lura in Kubernetes?

Accepted Answer

Since Lura is a Go application, you compile it into a binary and containerize it using Docker. Deployment involves creating a Kubernetes deployment YAML with the compiled image, similar to other Go services, though specific examples are not provided in the README.

Lura

What is Lura?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions