Question 1

Hybrids vs Lit comparison

Accepted Answer

Both use Web Components, but Hybrids emphasizes plain objects and pure functions with built-in state management and routing, while Lit is more minimal and class-based. Hybrids offers more features out of the box, but Lit has a larger ecosystem.

Question 2

How to handle routing in Hybrids?

Accepted Answer

Use the built-in router with a tree-based view structure, as shown in the routing example. Define views with stack configurations and use router.url() for navigation, supporting dialogs and protected views without complex setup.

Question 3

Is Hybrids production-ready for large apps?

Accepted Answer

Yes, with features like global state management and app-like routing, it's designed for complex applications. However, the smaller ecosystem might require more custom tooling or in-house solutions compared to React or Vue.

Question 4

How to use localization in Hybrids?

Accepted Answer

Hybrids provides automatic template translation with a CLI tool for message extraction. Define translations using localize() and embed messages in templates, as demonstrated in the localization example with dynamic content.

Question 5

Does Hybrids work with TypeScript?

Accepted Answer

Yes, but type definitions might be less comprehensive than in other frameworks. The plain object approach should integrate well, but you may need to handle types manually or rely on community contributions.

Question 6

What's the performance impact of Hybrids?

Accepted Answer

Performance is generally good due to native Web Components, but the layout engine and reactive updates might add overhead in very dynamic UIs. Benchmarking is recommended for performance-critical applications.

hybrids

What is hybrids?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions