htcat
A parallel and pipelined HTTP GET utility for high-speed data transfers, optimized for fast network interconnects.
What is htcat?
htcat is a command-line utility that performs parallel, pipelined HTTP GET requests to maximize download speeds, especially over high-bandwidth networks. It splits files into multiple range requests and emits bytes as soon as they are available, enabling efficient streaming into downstream command-line tools like tar. It is optimized for scenarios where large files are processed in pipelines, trading memory usage for lower latency and higher throughput.
System administrators, DevOps engineers, and developers working in high-bandwidth environments (e.g., cloud infrastructure like AWS EC2 to S3) who need to download and process large files efficiently in shell pipelines. It is also suitable for users requiring fast TLS-enabled transfers where traditional tools like curl underperform.
Developers choose htcat for its ability to significantly outperform tools like curl in TLS-enabled transfers, as shown in benchmarks, and its pipelined output that allows parallel processing with downstream tools. Its adaptive partitioning and defragmentation optimize for both speed and contiguous data emission, making it ideal for high-throughput data retrieval scenarios.
Overview
Parallel and Pipelined HTTP GET Utility
Use Cases
Best For
- Downloading large files from HTTP servers over high-bandwidth networks (e.g., gigabit connections) where speed is critical.
- Streaming data directly into command-line pipelines (e.g., extracting tar archives while downloading) to enable parallel processing.
- Accelerating TLS-enabled HTTP transfers where tools like curl show performance bottlenecks.
- Fetching files from cloud storage services like Amazon S3 to EC2 instances with minimal latency.
- Handling variable file sizes with adaptive request partitioning to balance latency and memory usage.
- Benchmarking or comparing HTTP download performance in controlled network environments.
Not Ideal For
- Servers that handle HTTP Range requests inefficiently, where single-stream tools like curl might perform better.
- Memory-constrained environments, as htcat's defragmentation buffer can use significant RAM for large files.
- Workflows requiring advanced HTTP features like authentication, cookies, or POST requests, since htcat is optimized for simple GETs.
- Low-bandwidth or high-latency networks, as htcat's parallelism is tuned for fast interconnects and may not provide benefits.
Pros & Cons
Pros
Splits downloads into multiple simultaneous HTTP Range requests, enabling high throughput on gigabit networks, as shown in benchmarks reaching 109 MB/s without TLS.
Emits bytes as soon as they are available, allowing downstream tools like tar to process data in parallel, reducing overall latency in shell pipelines.
Dynamically adjusts request size and count based on file size and network conditions, balancing latency and memory usage without manual tuning.
Demonstrates significant speed advantages over curl in TLS-enabled transfers, with benchmarks showing 59 MB/s for htcat vs 5 MB/s for curl in AWS S3 tests.
Cons
Performance suffers if servers process Range requests slower than regular GETs, as admitted in the README, making it unsuitable for all HTTP endpoints.
Focuses solely on HTTP GET requests; lacks features for authentication, custom headers, or other methods, restricting use in complex web interactions.
Requires memory for defragmentation buffers to reassemble out-of-order chunks, which can be problematic for very large files on resource-limited systems.
Frequently Asked Questions
Related Projects
fzf:cherry_blossom: A command-line fuzzy finder
diveA tool for exploring each layer in a docker image
HubA command-line tool that makes git easier to use with GitHub.
lo💥 A Lodash-style Go library based on Go 1.18+ Generics (map, filter, contains, find...)
Found a gem we're missing?
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.