Question 1

Is git-blame-someone-else safe to use on my main repository?

Accepted Answer

No, it's not safe for production or critical repositories. The README warns it can delete data, and it's intended only for humorous, non-essential use. Always test in a clone or backup first.

Question 2

How to revert changes made by git-blame-someone-else?

Accepted Answer

You'll need to use standard Git commands like `git reflog` or `git reset` to undo the changes manually, as the tool doesn't provide an undo feature. This requires familiarity with Git's recovery mechanisms.

Question 3

git-blame-someone-else vs git rebase - which is better for changing commit history?

Accepted Answer

git rebase is the proper, flexible tool for history rewriting in real projects, while git-blame-someone-else is a joke utility for quick author changes only. Use rebase for serious work, as it offers more control and safety.

Question 4

Can git-blame-someone-else change multiple commits at once?

Accepted Answer

No, it only handles a single commit at a time, as per the command syntax. For batch changes, you'd need to script it or use Git's native tools like filter-branch or filter-repo.

Question 5

Does git-blame-someone-else work with remote repositories like GitHub?

Accepted Answer

It modifies local commit history, so you'll need to force-push to update remote repositories, which can disrupt collaboration. The tool doesn't handle remote interactions automatically.

Question 6

What happens if I run git-blame-someone-else on a merge commit?

Accepted Answer

The README doesn't specify, but it likely changes the author and committer fields of the merge commit itself. However, this could lead to confusing history, and it's not recommended due to potential conflicts.

git-blame-someone-else

What is git-blame-someone-else?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions