Question 1

How to disable debug logs in FsHttp?

Accepted Answer

Call `FsHttp.Fsi.disableDebugLogs()` before making any requests to suppress console output. This is crucial for non-interactive environments like production apps to avoid log clutter.

Question 2

FsHttp vs HttpClient: which one should I use for .NET?

Accepted Answer

FsHttp offers a more expressive DSL and interactive features, making it better for readability and scripting. HttpClient is lighter and more integrated into .NET, so choose based on whether you prioritize syntax or minimal dependencies.

Question 3

Can FsHttp handle authentication like OAuth?

Accepted Answer

Yes, you can set custom headers directly in the request DSL for Bearer tokens or other auth methods. For complex flows, you may need to manage token retrieval externally before making requests.

Question 4

Is FsHttp thread-safe for concurrent requests?

Accepted Answer

FsHttp builds on .NET's HTTP infrastructure, so it should be thread-safe when used correctly. However, always test and configure error handling in multi-threaded scenarios to avoid issues.

Question 5

How to serialize XML bodies with FsHttp?

Accepted Answer

The README focuses on JSON serialization; for XML, you might need to use raw string bodies or extend the library, as built-in XML support isn't highlighted as a core feature.

Question 6

FsHttp or RestSharp for F# projects?

Accepted Answer

FsHttp is more idiomatic for F# with its functional DSL, while RestSharp is C#-focused. Choose FsHttp if you value a seamless F# experience and interactive capabilities over broader C# ecosystem integration.

FsHttp

What is FsHttp?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Open Source Alternative To

Frequently Asked Questions