A curated list of common misconceptions programmers have about fonts, typography, and font rendering.
Font-Falsehoods is a curated list of common incorrect assumptions programmers make about fonts, covering technical rendering details, licensing issues, and typographic subtleties. It helps developers avoid bugs and legal problems by highlighting misconceptions that can lead to faulty text handling in software.
Software developers, web designers, and anyone working with text rendering in applications or websites who needs to understand the complexities of font handling.
It provides a concise, focused collection of font-related pitfalls that aren't covered in typical documentation, saving developers from learning through costly mistakes and encouraging better practices in typography implementation.
Falsehoods programmers believe about fonts
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Lists dozens of specific falsehoods across technical, legal, and practical aspects, helping developers anticipate a wide range of issues in font handling.
Targets misconceptions unique to software development, excluding general typography myths, making it directly relevant for coding projects and bug avoidance.
Encourages submissions via GitHub issues, as noted in the README, ensuring the list stays current with evolving font technologies and practices.
Presents statements without explanations to encourage independent research, fostering deeper understanding and critical thinking among developers.
The README explicitly states it doesn't provide explanations for falsehoods, requiring developers to conduct their own research, which can be inefficient for quick problem-solving.
While it highlights problems, it doesn't offer code examples or step-by-step fixes, leaving implementation entirely up to the developer without guidance.
Excludes general typography falsehoods and focuses only on programmer-specific ones, which might leave gaps for those needing broader context in design or accessibility.