A community-driven style guide for writing consistent and idiomatic Elixir code.
The Elixir Style Guide is a community-driven resource that provides conventions and best practices for writing Elixir code. It covers formatting, naming, documentation, module organization, and other aspects to help developers produce consistent and idiomatic code. The guide aims to improve code readability and maintainability across Elixir projects.
Elixir developers of all levels, from beginners learning the language to experienced teams seeking to standardize their codebases. It's particularly useful for open-source contributors, code reviewers, and organizations adopting Elixir.
Developers choose this guide because it consolidates community-agreed conventions, reduces stylistic debates, and integrates well with Elixir's built-in formatter. It's freely available, regularly updated, and supported by translations in multiple languages.
A community driven style guide for Elixir
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Covers all aspects from formatting and naming to documentation and testing, as detailed in the extensive table of contents and sections like Expressions and Modules.
Reflects collective Elixir developer experience, with contributions and translations in nine languages, ensuring it stays relevant and widely accepted.
Aligns with Elixir's built-in code formatter and references linters like Credo, making automated enforcement straightforward for teams.
Uses 'not preferred' vs 'preferred' code snippets throughout, such as in the Formatting section, to illustrate guidelines concretely.
Some guidelines, like those on comments and metaprogramming, are not enforced by the formatter and can lead to debates or inconsistency in adoption.
The sheer volume of rules, from whitespace to testing conventions, might intimidate beginners or those unfamiliar with style guides.
As a community-driven project, it may evolve or have alternative guides (like Aleksei Magusev's), causing confusion over which standards to follow.