Question 1

Electron vs Tauri: which is better for desktop apps?

Accepted Answer

Electron is more mature with a larger ecosystem, ideal for complex apps using full web tech, while Tauri is lighter and uses system webviews, better for performance-focused projects. Electron's strength lies in its extensive APIs and proven track record.

Question 2

How to package an Electron app for distribution?

Accepted Answer

Use tools like electron-builder or electron-packager to create installers for different platforms. Configure your package.json and handle native modules, as Electron itself doesn't provide built-in packaging.

Question 3

Why does my Electron app use so much memory?

Accepted Answer

Electron apps run a full Chromium instance per process, which is memory-intensive. Optimize by disabling unused features and managing renderer processes, but some overhead is inherent.

Question 4

Can Electron apps access the file system?

Accepted Answer

Yes, through Node.js APIs integrated into Electron, allowing read/write operations. However, security best practices recommend sandboxing and context isolation to prevent vulnerabilities.

Question 5

Does Electron support older Windows versions like Windows 7?

Accepted Answer

No, support for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 was removed in Electron 23, following Chromium's deprecation policy. You need Windows 10 or newer.

Question 6

What are lightweight alternatives to Electron?

Accepted Answer

Consider Tauri or Neutralino.js for smaller footprints, as they use system webviews instead of bundling Chromium. These are better for simple apps but may lack Electron's feature depth.

electron

What is electron?

Overview

Use Cases

Best For

Related Projects

Found a gem we're missing?

Not Ideal For

Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Frequently Asked Questions