A C++ library for dynamic polymorphism using mixins, enabling runtime object composition and mutation.
DynaMix is a C++ library that implements dynamic polymorphism through mixins, allowing objects to be composed and modified at runtime. It solves the problem of rigid class hierarchies by enabling flexible, non-intrusive object composition, which enhances extensibility and interoperability in complex software systems.
C++ developers building systems with complex object architectures, such as game engines, CAD software, or enterprise applications, who need dynamic polymorphism and runtime flexibility.
Developers choose DynaMix for its high-performance runtime composition, minimal memory overhead, and ability to mutate objects dynamically without intrusive code changes, making it ideal for scalable and extensible architectures.
:fish_cake: A new take on polymorphism
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Enables dynamic object composition and live mutations at runtime, allowing behavior changes like adding or removing mixins without recompilation, as shown in game examples.
Mixins require no common parent or special code, keeping interfaces and implementations separate, which reduces coupling and improves code modularity.
Uses std::polymorphic_allocator for fine-tuned memory allocations, aiming for cache locality and minimal overhead, critical in performance-sensitive domains like games and CAD.
Supports shared libraries and plugins for dynamic object enrichment, enabling hotswap functionality during development and runtime extensibility without rebuilding executables.
v2 is a complete rewrite incompatible with v1, requiring significant migration efforts and potentially disrupting existing projects, as highlighted in the README's warning.
As an alternative to standard OOP, it introduces a steep learning curve and has a smaller community, making it less accessible for teams unfamiliar with mixin-based designs.
Despite performance optimizations, dynamic polymorphism and message dispatch inherently add overhead compared to static solutions, which may not suit all high-performance scenarios.