How do I set up codereview.gpt for GitHub Pull Requests?

Install the extension from the Chrome Web Store, add your OpenAI API key in settings, then navigate to a GitHub Pull Request and click the extension icon. The README outlines this simple process for quick integration.

Is codereview.gpt free to use or does it require OpenAI credits?

The extension itself is free, but you need an OpenAI API key with credits, which incurs costs based on usage. OpenAI charges per token, so frequent reviews can add up.

How accurate are codereview.gpt reviews compared to human reviewers?

While it can catch common bugs and suggest best practices, it's less reliable due to AI hallucinations, as warned in the FAQ. Use it as a supplementary tool, not a replacement.

Can codereview.gpt review code in private repositories?

Yes, it works with any PR/MR page you can access in the browser, but code is sent to OpenAI's API. Ensure compliance with your organization's data policies.

What programming languages does codereview.gpt support?

It uses ChatGPT, which has broad language support, but effectiveness varies. The extension processes code in patch format, so it handles any language Git can manage.

codereview.gpt vs CodeRabbit: which is better for automated code reviews?

codereview.gpt is a browser-based DIY tool with ChatGPT, offering privacy and low cost, while CodeRabbit is a dedicated service with more integrations. Choose based on automation needs and budget.

codereview.gpt

MITJavaScript

A Chrome extension that uses ChatGPT to automatically review GitHub Pull Requests and GitLab Merge Requests.

GitHub

What is codereview.gpt?

codereview.gpt is a Chrome extension that uses OpenAI's ChatGPT to automatically review code changes in GitHub Pull Requests and GitLab Merge Requests. It analyzes patches, commit messages, and descriptions to provide feedback on bugs, best practices, and improvements, helping developers catch issues they might have missed.

Target Audience

Developers and teams using GitHub or GitLab who want to augment their code review process with AI assistance, especially those looking to save time or get additional perspectives on their changes.

Value Proposition

It provides instant, AI-powered code reviews directly in the browser without requiring manual setup or integration, allowing developers to quickly get feedback and learn from ChatGPT's analysis while keeping the process private and under their control.

Overview

Reviews your Pull/Merge Requests using ChatGPT

Use Cases

Best For

Getting quick initial feedback on Pull Requests before human review
Learning coding best practices through AI-generated suggestions

Related Projects

Community-curated · Updated weekly · 100% open source

Found a gem we're missing?

Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.

Submit a project Star on GitHub

608 stars77 forks0 contributors

Catching simple bugs and code smells in changes

Reviewing code when team members are unavailable

Augmenting manual code review with additional perspectives

Practicing code review skills by comparing AI feedback with your own

Not Ideal For

Teams needing automated, integrated code review comments in CI/CD pipelines
Organizations with strict data privacy policies that prohibit sending code to external AI APIs
Developers using web browsers other than Chrome, such as Firefox or Safari
Projects requiring code reviews with highly specialized, domain-specific knowledge beyond general AI capabilities

Pros & Cons

Pros

Direct Browser Integration

Seamlessly works with GitHub and GitLab PRs/MRs directly in Chrome, requiring only extension installation for immediate use, as shown in the Installation section.

Local Processing and Caching

Reviews are performed locally and responses are cached in browser storage, enhancing efficiency and reducing API calls, based on the Permissions and Key Features.

Flexible Feedback Generation

Supports multiple review runs to get varied insights, useful for large PRs as suggested in the Usage section, allowing developers to catch more issues.

Privacy-Focused Design

Does not automatically post comments to PRs, keeping feedback private and under user control, as explicitly noted in the FAQ about copying output.

Cons

Dependency on OpenAI Costs

Requires an OpenAI API token with credits, introducing ongoing costs and reliance on a third-party service, which limits free or budget-sensitive use.

Limited Browser Compatibility

Only supports Chrome, excluding other browsers, as stated in Supported browsers, restricting accessibility for diverse team environments.

Unreliable AI Suggestions

The FAQ admits reviews are not 100% trustworthy and can hallucinate, necessitating manual verification and reducing confidence in automated feedback.