A curated awesome list of resources for Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) technologies.
Awesome-SOAR is a curated GitHub repository that compiles resources, tools, and information about Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR) platforms. It helps security teams discover standards, playbooks, vendor solutions, and community knowledge to implement and optimize automated incident response processes.
Security operations center (SOC) analysts, incident responders, cybersecurity architects, and IT security managers evaluating or implementing SOAR solutions.
It saves significant research time by providing a single, community-vetted source for SOAR-related information, including comparisons of both commercial and open-source tools, which is especially valuable in a fragmented and rapidly evolving market.
A curated Cyber "Security Orchestration, Automation and Response (SOAR)" awesome list.
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Curates a wide range of materials from global standards like NIST to playbook templates and automation scripts, saving significant research time as highlighted in the README's structured sections.
Provides extensive listings for commercial, open-source, and SIEM-integrated SOAR solutions, including support links, community forums, and documentation, as seen in the SOAR-Solutions categories with sub-links.
Includes articles, presentations, training courses, and user communities like the SOAR Telegram Group, facilitating continuous education and collaboration for security teams.
Built on open principles with contribution guidelines, encouraging community updates and reducing vendor lock-in by highlighting multiple solutions.
Many linked resources, such as market research from 2019-2020, may not reflect the current SOAR landscape, risking obsolete advice for fast-evolving tools.
Serves as a link repository without editorial comparisons or performance evaluations, forcing users to independently assess tools despite the curated structure.
Some vendor entries have incomplete or missing links (e.g., 'Not Available' for support or forums), reducing utility for thorough evaluation and indicating curation gaps.