A curated list of Quarto talks, tools, examples, and articles for the open-source scientific publishing system.
Awesome Quarto is a community-maintained, curated directory of resources for Quarto, an open-source scientific and technical publishing system. It serves as a central hub for discovering tutorials, extensions, real-world examples, and tools to enhance workflows with Quarto. The project organizes resources like official documentation, editor support, deployment guides, and community content to help users effectively publish documents, websites, books, and presentations.
Developers, researchers, and authors using Quarto for scientific and technical publishing who need a comprehensive, up-to-date collection of learning materials, tools, and examples. It is particularly valuable for those transitioning from tools like R Markdown or seeking to optimize their Quarto projects with extensions and CI/CD setups.
Developers choose Awesome Quarto because it aggregates and organizes the fragmented ecosystem of Quarto resources into a single, community-vetted directory. Its unique value lies in being the most current and extensive collection available, with curated listings for tutorials, packages, real-world examples, and extensions, saving users time from scouring the internet.
A curated list of Quarto talks, tools, examples & articles! Contributions welcome!
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Organizes a vast array of tutorials, packages, and examples for Quarto across multiple programming languages and editors, as detailed in the categorized README sections.
Encourages contributions via issues and pull requests, fostering an up-to-date collection that reflects the evolving Quarto ecosystem.
Includes deployment guides for GitHub Actions and other platforms, providing actionable steps to automate publishing workflows.
Features examples like the R for Data Science book and various websites, offering inspiration and best practices for users.
The list's accuracy and timeliness hinge on community contributions, which can lead to gaps or outdated entries without dedicated oversight.
Lacks features like search, ratings, or comments, making it harder to filter or assess the quality of listed resources compared to dynamic platforms.
Relies on external URLs that may become broken over time, potentially reducing the directory's reliability without automated link checking.