Advanced OAuth2/OpenID Connect server framework for ASP.NET Core and OWIN/Katana with a low-level, protocol-first approach.
AspNet.Security.OpenIdConnect.Server is an advanced OAuth2/OpenID Connect server framework for ASP.NET Core and OWIN/Katana. It enables developers to build custom identity providers and authentication servers with fine-grained control over protocol implementation. The framework focuses on low-level primitives rather than high-level abstractions, allowing for tailored authentication flows.
Backend developers and security engineers building custom authentication servers or identity providers in .NET ecosystems who need protocol-level control.
Developers choose this framework for its protocol-first design that doesn't hide implementation details, giving them maximum flexibility to implement OpenID Connect and OAuth2 specifications exactly as needed for their use cases.
OpenID Connect/OAuth2 server framework for OWIN/Katana and ASP.NET Core
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Provides low-level primitives and event handlers like OnValidateTokenRequest, allowing developers to implement custom authentication logic with fine-grained precision, as shown in the README's manual validation examples.
Compatible with both ASP.NET Core and OWIN/Katana, easing migration from legacy .NET applications, which is explicitly stated in the dual platform support feature.
Implements OpenID Connect constants and standard claim types, ensuring interoperability with other systems, as highlighted in the protocol-first design.
Uses an event-based provider model that lets developers hook into various stages of token issuance and validation, demonstrated through customizable handlers in the code samples.
The project has been merged into OpenIddict, meaning no new features or independent updates, which could lead to security and compatibility issues over time, as warned in the README banner.
Requires manual coding for security-critical aspects such as client authentication and token validation, increasing development time and error risk, evident in the verbose event handler setups.
Lacks built-in support for common scenarios like user management or consent screens, forcing developers to build these from scratch, unlike more opinionated alternatives.