How to handle asynchronous state updates in Store?

Store supports async/await for defining operations that perform asynchronous tasks, ensuring state changes remain transactional. You can use async functions within operations to manage network calls or other async work while maintaining predictable flow.

Store vs The Composable Architecture for SwiftUI?

Store focuses on transactional operations and unidirectional flow, while TCA offers a more comprehensive functional approach with effects management. Store is lighter and more state-mutation focused, whereas TCA includes built-in testing utilities and a broader ecosystem.

Is Store good for large-scale applications?

Yes, Store's predictable data flow and transactional operations make it suitable for complex applications with intricate state logic. However, the low test coverage and ongoing rework might be concerns for mission-critical production systems requiring stability.

How to integrate Store with existing SwiftUI views?

Use Store's property wrappers or bindings to connect state to SwiftUI views; define state and operations, then inject the Store into the view hierarchy using environment or observed objects. The README emphasizes seamless SwiftUI integration for declarative UI updates.

Does Store support state persistence like Core Data?

Store primarily manages in-memory state and doesn't provide built-in persistence; for saving data, you need to integrate with external storage solutions like Core Data or UserDefaults separately, which adds extra implementation effort.

What platforms does Store support?

Store is cross-platform, supporting macOS, iOS, WatchOS, tvOS, and Linux, as shown in the platform badges. This makes it versatile for various Apple devices and server-side Swift projects, though Linux support might be less tested.

Open-Awesome

Dispatch

Swift3.8.0

A unidirectional, transactional, operation-based state management library for Swift and SwiftUI applications.

GitHub

501 stars34 forks0 contributors

What is Dispatch?

Store is a state management library for Swift and SwiftUI applications that implements a unidirectional, transactional, and operation-based architecture. It provides a predictable way to handle state changes in iOS, macOS, watchOS, tvOS, and Linux applications by ensuring state mutations follow a strict flow and are performed as atomic transactions.

Target Audience

Swift developers building applications with SwiftUI who need a robust, predictable state management solution for complex user interfaces and data flows.

Value Proposition

Developers choose Store for its strict unidirectional data flow, transactional operation guarantees, and seamless integration with SwiftUI and modern Swift concurrency features like async/await, making state management more maintainable and testable.

Overview

Unidirectional, transactional, operation-based Store implementation.

Use Cases

Best For

Managing complex state in SwiftUI applications
Implementing predictable state mutations in iOS/macOS apps
Handling asynchronous operations with async/await in state management
Building testable state logic with transactional guarantees
Creating maintainable data flow architectures in Swift projects
Developing cross-platform Swift apps for Apple ecosystems and Linux

Not Ideal For

Projects requiring high test coverage and mature documentation
Teams not using modern Swift concurrency features like async/await
Applications with simple state needs where a full unidirectional flow is overkill

Pros & Cons

Pros

Predictable Data Flow

Enforces unidirectional data flow, making state mutations predictable and easier to debug, as highlighted in the key features.

Transactional Guarantees

State updates are atomic transactions, ensuring consistency and preventing partial updates, per the transactional operations architecture.

Async/Await Integration

Built with modern Swift concurrency features, allowing clean handling of asynchronous operations in state management.

SwiftUI First-Class Support

Designed to work seamlessly with SwiftUI's declarative framework, as stated in the integration features.

Cons

Low Test Coverage

With only 45.8% code coverage indicated by the badge, the library may have untested areas and potential reliability issues.

In-Development Instability

The library is being reworked to adopt async/await, which could lead to breaking changes and incomplete features during transition.

Architectural Complexity

The transactional and operation-based architecture requires a steeper learning curve and more boilerplate compared to simpler state management solutions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Projects

Swift Algorithm Club

Algorithms and data structures in Swift, with explanations!

Stars29,094

Forks4,949

Last commit1 year ago

Dollar

A functional tool-belt for Swift Language similar to Lo-Dash or Underscore.js in Javascript

Stars4,239

Forks362

Last commit2 years ago

DifferenceKit

💻 A fast and flexible O(n) difference algorithm framework for Swift collection.

Stars3,663

Forks242

Last commit1 month ago

Result

Swift type modelling the success/failure of arbitrary operations.

Stars2,493

Forks227

Last commit5 years ago

Community-curated · Updated weekly · 100% open source

Found a gem we're missing?

Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.

Submit a project Star on GitHub