A mega list of 1-on-1 meeting questions compiled from various sources to improve manager-employee conversations.
1on1-questions is a curated mega-list of conversation prompts and discussion topics designed for managers to use in one-on-one meetings with their employees. It solves the problem of unproductive or repetitive check-ins by providing a vast, categorized resource to foster deeper dialogue about career growth, job satisfaction, team dynamics, and personal well-being.
Managers, team leads, and HR professionals who conduct regular one-on-one meetings and want to improve their quality and effectiveness. It's also useful for developers building HR or management tools that incorporate meeting facilitation features.
Developers and managers choose this project because it offers an extensive, ready-to-use question bank that saves time and inspires more meaningful conversations. Its availability in JSON format makes it easily integrable into applications, distinguishing it from simple blog posts or articles.
Mega list of 1 on 1 meeting questions compiled from a variety to sources
Open-Awesome is built by the community, for the community. Submit a project, suggest an awesome list, or help improve the catalog on GitHub.
Offers over 200 curated questions across categories like Career Development and Job Satisfaction, compiled from multiple sources to address various aspects of employee experience.
Provides a well-structured JSON file for direct integration into applications, enabling features like automated question generation without parsing markdown, as highlighted in the README's FAQ.
Accepts contributions via pull requests, allowing the list to grow with diverse perspectives and stay updated through community input, as noted in the Contributing section.
Uses a GitHub action to generate the README from the JSON file, ensuring consistency between the data and human-readable format and reducing maintenance overhead.
The project is purely a data set; users must develop their own apps or tools to interact with the questions, as evidenced by the listed third-party applications in the README.
While questions are categorized, there's no advice on sequencing, timing, or tailoring to specific situations, which could lead to ineffective use in complex managerial scenarios.
As a community-driven project, contributions aren't formally vetted, potentially introducing irrelevant or poorly worded questions that may not suit all organizational cultures.